26 Comments
User's avatar
William Hunter Duncan's avatar

https://kstp.com/kstp-news/top-news/minneapolis-city-council-member-granted-restraining-order-against-citizen/

A similar thing happened in Minneapolis. One of the monsters told a council member basically, 'you are done, i know where you live, I'm coming after you and your family, this is a real threat.' If he were MAGA he'd be in prison for terroristic threats. All he gets because he is a lefty is a restraining order.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Crazy. Of course, the FBI has no agents to spare to investigate him, because they're too busy harassing Catholic pro-life activists and parents who complain too loudly at school board meetings.

Expand full comment
William Hunter Duncan's avatar

Yeah, that and policing speech on social media...oh, and managing the "missing" count in Lihaina.

Expand full comment
Christopher Messina's avatar

They bothered to issue a restraining order? I am surprised.

Expand full comment
The Inmate's avatar

Excellent article, Daniel. Thanks for this.

Augustine's or Aquinas's (can't remember which) answer to "Do what thou wilt" is "Love and do what thou wilt."

Aquinas also wrote: "He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust. "

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Thanks for the Aquinas quote! He said it perfectly!

Expand full comment
Nathan Shumate's avatar

I note, with much head-shaking, that of the three examples of DARVO given on the Wikipedia page, one is of President Trump and one is of Justice Kavanaugh. Even on the DARVO page, they're DARVOing.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Great example! And sadly, I am not at all surprised. Just ignore Hillary Clinton/the DNC/the FBI manufacturing "Russiagate" and Biden's DOJ prosecuting Trump for questioning election results after Democrats did the exact same thing over the 2016 election, and just focus on Trump's response, take it out of context, and act like it just happened because Trump is a wannabe Hitler. They illustrate DARVO perfectly while describing DARVO, without a hint of irony or self-awareness.

Expand full comment
Alexander Scipio's avatar

It seems obvious that this female behavior would evolve from the combination of suffrage and chivalry. For generations, we in the West have pampered women: opened their doors, carried their packages, paid for social engagements, women and children first,” etc.

The idea this sense of entitlement would NOT bleed into behaviors and politics, women having been conditioned that they are important enough for us to go out of our way in how we treat them and in getting their way, now seems existentially naive, no?

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Bill Burr said it best: there's a vortex of lies surrounding women and their issues, but nobody tells them how full of shit they are because we want to fuck them. There's a great essay I read a few months ago about the mixing of feminine and masculine norms and the incoherent double standards that result from that; when I remember where I read it, I'll post the link.

Expand full comment
Alexander Scipio's avatar

I look forward to that essay - Burr is irrefutably correct.

Expand full comment
Boflys's avatar

Excellent article.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Thanks!

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

I continue to object to calling these demented trannies, African race-grifters and the rest of these garbage-humans 'Marxist' even if that's what they call themselves: the old skool real Marxists, the Soviet, Chinese and Cuban Communists, would like as not have them all shot as degenerate bourgeois parasites, and good riddance.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

That would be nice, if we could somehow transport them back to the Stalin-era USSR of Maoist China and let them experience their ideology full force.

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

Ojala, make it so, ship them straight to Kolyma, let them die mining gold for Stalin.

Expand full comment
Douglas McClenaghan's avatar

This was brilliant. So accurate and giving great advice about how to deal with these psychos.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Thank you, sir!

Expand full comment
Johnny108's avatar

Don’t continue to point out their wrongdoing, or they will gain sympathy from the crowd- mock and ridicule them, so people are aware of their toddler-like behaviors.

A joke is the better way to criticize because you must think on the ridiculous nature of the situation to find the humor. This is why tyrants allow no jokes at their expense

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

Mockery and derisive laughter are definitely warranted and effective! It gets under their demonic skin when they see they're not succeeding in making you as miserable as they are.

Expand full comment
Joseph L. Wiess's avatar

In hunter-gatherer societies, such people are conveniently killed in hunting accidents; in modern civilization, they just bounce from self-created disaster to self-created disaster, always leaving a trail of wreckage behind them for others to clean up. -

Oh, to be able to banish people and have it mean something again. Then we could banish all the uncivil people to the wilderness, where they belong.

Expand full comment
Christopher Messina's avatar

Spot on. The more people are prepared to deal with these calculated outbursts, the sooner we will get back to a semblance of true civility. I recall a conference call with my Congressional Representative in mid-2020. It was a conference call, so the moderator could mute people at will One woman asked "Hey, why can't we have these town hall meetings in person? Wouldn't that be a more effective way for you to speak to your constituents?" Rep. Posey laughed in response and said "CHECK! I was wondering how long that would take!" Then he went on to say that ALL Republican Representatives had been warned about this question, because (1) the person asking is likely not actually a constituent, (2) the questioner does not want to hear answers but is angry that in a conference call format, she and her fellow Lefty assholes cannot show up to the meeting and scream so no one else can talk or hear. Their only agenda is to disrupt, so they try to pressure Congresspeople to hold in person meetings so they scream and howl like little bratty babies.

Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

That tactic is par for the course for Team Left. Imagine being such a miserable wretch that you sign onto Team Left and devote your time and resources to your role in their coordinated campaign of destruction, destabilization, and demoralization, thereby ruining society for everyone else, with marginal benefit to yourself and your comrades (eventually the revolution eats its own and only the most ruthless and lucky make it to the top). These folks really are the worst of the worst.

Expand full comment
Jim's avatar

As a quasi-Argentino, I must object to your misuse of el Che here. He is still deeply regarded in South America: one can probably still find his picture next to JFK's as a sort of shrine in many peasant houses.

El Che was a credentialed medical doctor before he left Argentina to practice medicine in some gawdaful place, a leper colony somewhere. Eventually he came to see extreme poverty as an underlying malady medicine couldn't cure, met Fidel Castro in Mexico, and the rest is history. He was a deeply moral figure, sacrificing a medical career and eventually his life in what he conceived as service to the people. His reaction to tranny crybullies pitching a fit would probably have been to have them shot.

Something one needs to understand about the real commies, not the bullshit USA posers, is that some of them really believed in it, were willing to die for it, and were intensely moral, principled people leading austere lives of hardship and sacrifice.

The fact that their ideology turned out to be fundamentally flawed and has been largely abandoned doesn't change that, just as whatever one thinks of Christianity doesn't nullify the lives of the saints and martyrs.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

It really sucks that these retarded, psychopathic grifters are the politically-favored class right now. That's Marxism for you. As Jesse Kelly calls it, "The religion of the malcontent." People who would be failures in any kind of real meritocracy are propped up and made into the elites by Marxcissists, which is one of Marxism's worst features (out of many terrible features).

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Daniel D's avatar

They don't really value any of the things they want to take over, except as a means of spreading their Harrison Bergeron dystopia by getting their handicapper generals empowered to promote mediocrity and ugliness in more cultural spaces.

Expand full comment