An excellent read, especially since he refers to 'intraspecies [intraspecific] predators'. I propose that our Khazar Talmudist overlords are an example of rapid forced evolution into intraspecific obligate parasites.
"Ponerology mainly focuses on sociopaths, these being the most destructive of the intraspecies predators, but for purely rhetorical reasons I prefer to focus on narcissists."
It can look that way, the way being Sicilian would have seemed to be an indicator of underworld connections in the 1950s, and that correlation should be examined for similar reasons. At the same time, not all Sicilians were mobsters, and not all Jews are banksters or Marxists. I used to work with a Cuban Jew who was *the* most anti-Marxist of all the anti-Marxists that have ever lived. I was in the Army with another Jew who was even more of a blue-collar redneck than Larry the Cable Guy pretended to be (this guy was an electrician in a small Southern town), and his politics were also in line with those of the typical blue-collar redneck. And whatever cabal may exist among the world's parasitic elite class, there are more than a few gentiles in their ranks (Bill Gates, the British royals, Klaus Schwab, etc.). When you look at a story like Sam Bankster-Fraud and everyone involved is Jewish, you are basically looking at the work of an organized crime syndicate that has a disproportionate amount of Jews, but which does have gentiles who play important roles in it. Neither my former coworker nor the Jew I was in the Army with are connected to that organized crime syndicate or benefit from it in any way, and I suspect there are a lot of Jews who are like them. Also, I see several prominent Jews who, at least as much as any public figure, are opposing the work of the globalist cabal. Remember too that Rudy Guliani, a Sicilian, got his start as a prosecutor taking down the mob. I don't see it as a winning strategy to make it all about ethnicity and thereby push potentially helpful allies into the arms of the cabal, while ignoring the gentiles who are also in league with it.
You are of course right that most Jews are little Jews, ordinary people, not the mafia of Big Jews I refer to.
Only going after the actual identified Mafia members resulted in our nation enduring decades of crime and corruption, turning the Northeast from a high-trust society into a low-trust society. It allowed the sharks a safe sea to swim in. This was a profound mistake. We should have gone after their friends, family, known associates, with very liberal use of deportation back to Sicily, until their own real countrymen killed them.
Given that the stakes are so much higher now, I would proceed in that manner with the Big Jews and their entourages, strongly encourage them to 'ascend' to Israel, minus their ill-gotten gains.
Otherwise, nothing will stop their controlled demolition and White genocide. They certainly won't be voted out: what they want, at least in foreign and military policy, is never on the ballot.
Once our civilization got serious about taking down the mob it didn't take long. RICO statutes and coordination across jurisdictions was a big part of that. Of course, now federal law enforcement and Blue Zone prosecutors are owned by the cartel. As a result of that, the Rule of Law is effectively dead at the federal level and in almost all the Blue areas. By pushing their demonic combination of anarcho tyranny and Bolshevik repression, the cartel will provoke an equal and opposite reaction, and it's going to be bad.
Have you read People's Republic by Kurt Schlichter (novel set after the breakup of the USA, with Blue States being the ones to leave) or Clay Martin's Wrath of the Wendigo (similar premise, except it's the Red States that seceded)? I think it's almost inevitable that some national breakup will happen at some point. The best case scenario would be the Blue States get fed up and leave, because I cannot imagine the Red States trying to stop them. On the other hand, if the Red States tried to leave, the Blue Tribe absolutely would try to force them to stay against their will, which is where shit would really hit the fan. For the love of God and all that is good, I hope and pray the Blue States are the ones who leave. But that would take something like Trump winning the election and actually taking office, which the Blue Team has determined not to allow to happen. I don't think most people realize how bad this can get in a short order. It's like we're on the Titanic and the crew in charge of the ship is actually trying to ram the iceberg. In the aftermath of that, all bets are off, and anything, including the scenario you bring up, is possible.
I couldn't possibly agree with you more, except the bit about the mob. It seems to me that Elliott Ness was pretty serious about taking at least Al Capone down long before I was born, yet I grew up in the dispiriting environment of a Northeast state where the state and the big city government were known to be completely mobbed-up, and this because of the states large Italian population (fish:sea). I kind of miss the mob in retrospect, because they were 'thieves at law' like the Vory or Yakuza: organized, regulated crime that was mostly downright polite to civilians: gentlemen criminals, unlike the non-White garbage of today.
I would much like to read both books, which sound excellent, but of course neither author is in my state library system (while of course every never-Trump neocon is).
I had not considered the idea of the Blues seceding, because domination is at the core of their values, but there is in fact a precedent: the New England states, especially the always-loathesome Massachusetts, were during the War of 1812 so monarchist-Anglophile, and so outraged by their loss of trade (and they lived on trade) that near the end of the war they called a convention to consider secession, and probably would have had the war not ended right about then.
Think of it: New England part of England again, and not part of the USA; the primary exponents of Federalism back with the monarchy they cherished; almost certainly no War of Northern Aggression against the South: a great opportunity missed.
Totally agree. I was surprised listening to him recently. Here's are a few of things he said:
"I'm sure you're all vaccinated or gonna die. We all know some anti-vaxxers and some of us used to know an anti-vaxxer. Strange how that's funny, right? Ha, ha, ha, they died. Ha, ha, ha."
"There was a shift in our empathy during the pandemic. I think it was those anti-vax preachers. Remember reading about them, you're like: 'Anti-vax preacher dies of Covid.' Good. I can say that because I'm a Christian."
Then on Climate Change:
" I don't know much about global warming, but I do know they stopped debating it."
Say what?! that last one really got me laughing. Tell me you're ignorant and then display that ignorance.
Colbert could deliver lines well back on his old show. His writers were the funny ones. Now he's got neither. I tried to watch anything else he was ever in and it all sucked. Sad!
The Fleetwood Mac thing is hilarious and true. My lunkhead brother in law tried that line on me about 20 years ago so I gave early Mac a listen. Total shite.
And I'm glad at least one person liked the Fleetwood Mac one; I was worried it would be too niche. Sometimes the popular consensus is absolutely correct, as it was in the relative popularity of Fleetwood Mac's various lineups.
You're probably right about Colbert's writers being the funny ones . I believe his pre-TV background is in improv rather than standup. I've noticed a real difference between standups and former improv actors when they get TV shows: the standups tend to be far less dependent on their writers and on funny situations in order to be funny themselves.
He did another show, I think it was in the 90s, that some people thought was great. I watched a bit and it was terrible. Give me Kids in the Hall, SCTV, Always Sunny in Philadelphia -- those are the gems of the past 40 years. Character humor is always the best -- that's why The Colbert Show worked: it was a funny character, though looking back it was some low hanging fruit to mock guys like Hannity and O'Reilly.
Mike MacRae's O'Reilly bits on Jimmy Dore are totally hilarious. I recommend his Luke Russert and "Hillary Supporter" characters as well. I believe all that stuff was written by Kurt Metzger.
Now even Jim Gaffigan, in his Dark Pale special, has felt the need to comment on vaccines and climate change and, unfortunately, he shows he's followed the narrative like a good little useful idiot. He should stick to food....something he knows about.
Though he was never one of my favorites, Jim Gaffigan is another one who has real talent but has chosen to squander it with a career change from comedy to Conformmunist agitprop. It's one thing to see some wokoid hack doing it, but it's quite another to see someone who could actually be good going that route.
"Marxcissist": nice. Needs to be added to the OED.
"Marxcissist" is perfect. I got it from John Carter: https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-marxcissists
An excellent read, especially since he refers to 'intraspecies [intraspecific] predators'. I propose that our Khazar Talmudist overlords are an example of rapid forced evolution into intraspecific obligate parasites.
"Ponerology mainly focuses on sociopaths, these being the most destructive of the intraspecies predators, but for purely rhetorical reasons I prefer to focus on narcissists."
It can look that way, the way being Sicilian would have seemed to be an indicator of underworld connections in the 1950s, and that correlation should be examined for similar reasons. At the same time, not all Sicilians were mobsters, and not all Jews are banksters or Marxists. I used to work with a Cuban Jew who was *the* most anti-Marxist of all the anti-Marxists that have ever lived. I was in the Army with another Jew who was even more of a blue-collar redneck than Larry the Cable Guy pretended to be (this guy was an electrician in a small Southern town), and his politics were also in line with those of the typical blue-collar redneck. And whatever cabal may exist among the world's parasitic elite class, there are more than a few gentiles in their ranks (Bill Gates, the British royals, Klaus Schwab, etc.). When you look at a story like Sam Bankster-Fraud and everyone involved is Jewish, you are basically looking at the work of an organized crime syndicate that has a disproportionate amount of Jews, but which does have gentiles who play important roles in it. Neither my former coworker nor the Jew I was in the Army with are connected to that organized crime syndicate or benefit from it in any way, and I suspect there are a lot of Jews who are like them. Also, I see several prominent Jews who, at least as much as any public figure, are opposing the work of the globalist cabal. Remember too that Rudy Guliani, a Sicilian, got his start as a prosecutor taking down the mob. I don't see it as a winning strategy to make it all about ethnicity and thereby push potentially helpful allies into the arms of the cabal, while ignoring the gentiles who are also in league with it.
You are of course right that most Jews are little Jews, ordinary people, not the mafia of Big Jews I refer to.
Only going after the actual identified Mafia members resulted in our nation enduring decades of crime and corruption, turning the Northeast from a high-trust society into a low-trust society. It allowed the sharks a safe sea to swim in. This was a profound mistake. We should have gone after their friends, family, known associates, with very liberal use of deportation back to Sicily, until their own real countrymen killed them.
Given that the stakes are so much higher now, I would proceed in that manner with the Big Jews and their entourages, strongly encourage them to 'ascend' to Israel, minus their ill-gotten gains.
Otherwise, nothing will stop their controlled demolition and White genocide. They certainly won't be voted out: what they want, at least in foreign and military policy, is never on the ballot.
Once our civilization got serious about taking down the mob it didn't take long. RICO statutes and coordination across jurisdictions was a big part of that. Of course, now federal law enforcement and Blue Zone prosecutors are owned by the cartel. As a result of that, the Rule of Law is effectively dead at the federal level and in almost all the Blue areas. By pushing their demonic combination of anarcho tyranny and Bolshevik repression, the cartel will provoke an equal and opposite reaction, and it's going to be bad.
Have you read People's Republic by Kurt Schlichter (novel set after the breakup of the USA, with Blue States being the ones to leave) or Clay Martin's Wrath of the Wendigo (similar premise, except it's the Red States that seceded)? I think it's almost inevitable that some national breakup will happen at some point. The best case scenario would be the Blue States get fed up and leave, because I cannot imagine the Red States trying to stop them. On the other hand, if the Red States tried to leave, the Blue Tribe absolutely would try to force them to stay against their will, which is where shit would really hit the fan. For the love of God and all that is good, I hope and pray the Blue States are the ones who leave. But that would take something like Trump winning the election and actually taking office, which the Blue Team has determined not to allow to happen. I don't think most people realize how bad this can get in a short order. It's like we're on the Titanic and the crew in charge of the ship is actually trying to ram the iceberg. In the aftermath of that, all bets are off, and anything, including the scenario you bring up, is possible.
I couldn't possibly agree with you more, except the bit about the mob. It seems to me that Elliott Ness was pretty serious about taking at least Al Capone down long before I was born, yet I grew up in the dispiriting environment of a Northeast state where the state and the big city government were known to be completely mobbed-up, and this because of the states large Italian population (fish:sea). I kind of miss the mob in retrospect, because they were 'thieves at law' like the Vory or Yakuza: organized, regulated crime that was mostly downright polite to civilians: gentlemen criminals, unlike the non-White garbage of today.
I would much like to read both books, which sound excellent, but of course neither author is in my state library system (while of course every never-Trump neocon is).
I had not considered the idea of the Blues seceding, because domination is at the core of their values, but there is in fact a precedent: the New England states, especially the always-loathesome Massachusetts, were during the War of 1812 so monarchist-Anglophile, and so outraged by their loss of trade (and they lived on trade) that near the end of the war they called a convention to consider secession, and probably would have had the war not ended right about then.
Think of it: New England part of England again, and not part of the USA; the primary exponents of Federalism back with the monarchy they cherished; almost certainly no War of Northern Aggression against the South: a great opportunity missed.
Totally agree. I was surprised listening to him recently. Here's are a few of things he said:
"I'm sure you're all vaccinated or gonna die. We all know some anti-vaxxers and some of us used to know an anti-vaxxer. Strange how that's funny, right? Ha, ha, ha, they died. Ha, ha, ha."
"There was a shift in our empathy during the pandemic. I think it was those anti-vax preachers. Remember reading about them, you're like: 'Anti-vax preacher dies of Covid.' Good. I can say that because I'm a Christian."
Then on Climate Change:
" I don't know much about global warming, but I do know they stopped debating it."
Say what?! that last one really got me laughing. Tell me you're ignorant and then display that ignorance.
If we are in a simulation, it's like they used the code from the People's Temple Kool-Aid drinkers to program all the new NPCs.
Colbert could deliver lines well back on his old show. His writers were the funny ones. Now he's got neither. I tried to watch anything else he was ever in and it all sucked. Sad!
The Fleetwood Mac thing is hilarious and true. My lunkhead brother in law tried that line on me about 20 years ago so I gave early Mac a listen. Total shite.
And I'm glad at least one person liked the Fleetwood Mac one; I was worried it would be too niche. Sometimes the popular consensus is absolutely correct, as it was in the relative popularity of Fleetwood Mac's various lineups.
You're probably right about Colbert's writers being the funny ones . I believe his pre-TV background is in improv rather than standup. I've noticed a real difference between standups and former improv actors when they get TV shows: the standups tend to be far less dependent on their writers and on funny situations in order to be funny themselves.
He did another show, I think it was in the 90s, that some people thought was great. I watched a bit and it was terrible. Give me Kids in the Hall, SCTV, Always Sunny in Philadelphia -- those are the gems of the past 40 years. Character humor is always the best -- that's why The Colbert Show worked: it was a funny character, though looking back it was some low hanging fruit to mock guys like Hannity and O'Reilly.
Mike MacRae's O'Reilly bits on Jimmy Dore are totally hilarious. I recommend his Luke Russert and "Hillary Supporter" characters as well. I believe all that stuff was written by Kurt Metzger.
Kurt Metzger is hilarious!
Now even Jim Gaffigan, in his Dark Pale special, has felt the need to comment on vaccines and climate change and, unfortunately, he shows he's followed the narrative like a good little useful idiot. He should stick to food....something he knows about.
Though he was never one of my favorites, Jim Gaffigan is another one who has real talent but has chosen to squander it with a career change from comedy to Conformmunist agitprop. It's one thing to see some wokoid hack doing it, but it's quite another to see someone who could actually be good going that route.
Craig Ferguson should have Colbert's job.