"Hate Speech" Bad, but Pedophiles Are Okay???
Interesting to note which platforms the pro-censorship Conformmunists have a problem with, and which ones they don't . . .
So the Church Ladies of Substack, Conformmunist clowns like Jonathan M Katz, Marisa Kabas,1 and Amran Gowani, have decided this platform has a problem. Apparently, there’s too much freedom of speech, meaning people might utter an impure thought that would offend their virginal minds. But no worries! These brave moral crusaders are proposing the perfect solution: deputize them and their fellow travelers as Substack’s official Hall Monitors. They will make sure everyone behaves themselves at all times and nobody discusses any ideas of which the regime does not approve.
Sadly, my previous posts about Marxcissist maniacs and their crybully mind-games, which were written the last time a cabal of commie Karens demanded censorship on Substack back in April, have turned out to be evergreen. The names may be different, but the NPC hive mind programming and passive-aggressive guerilla moralizing are exactly the same.
X (a.k.a., Twitter) has been under similar pressure from activists and advertisers (a.k.a, bankster-contolled corporations2) of late, for all the same reasons. We’ve got to reign in all that “misinformation” and “hate speech” in order to preserve “our democracy.” And who determines what counts as “misinformation” and “hate speech?” If the infamous Twitter files (Thank you, Elon Musk!) are any guide, it’s your friends at the FBI and CIA. Wow! What stunning and brave revolutionaries today’s Conformmunists are! “There are people who want to say things the FBI and CIA disapprove of! We demand that Twitter and Substack put a stop to that at once!”
But you know something odd? For some reason, no similar campaigns exist to pressure Facebook and Instagram into restricting who is allowed to share messages on their sites. No bankster-controlled advertisers are boycotting Meta. Jonathan M Katz, Marisa Kabas, and Amran Gowani are not writing open letters and Atlantic articles begging for Meta’s management to crack down on everyone who is misusing their platforms. And who might be misusing Meta’s platform to harm the vulnerable? Oh, just a few gigantic pedophile networks.3 And it’s not like news about Meta’s pedophile problem is particularly hard to find — even a regular Google or DuckDuckGo search will bring up relevant articles from mainstream sources that even echo-chamber-loving leftists have been known to cite, like The Wall Street Journal, The Independent, Yahoo News, etc.
So the wannabe hall monitors of social media have a problem with platforms that allow too much free speech, but they don’t seem to have a problem with platforms that allow unchecked pedophilia. To quote Elon Musk, “Interesting.”
Jonathan M Katz and Marisa Kabas appear to be active on Facebook and Instagram. I did internet searches for any articles these two brave culture warriors might have written calling for Meta to remove the pedophiles from their platforms, but surprise, surprise, nothing came up! You know, call me crazy, but I’m beginning to think that all their grandstanding about protecting vulnerable populations from harm is just a pretext for something else. (And what might that be?)
Disney is one of the companies boycotting X (Twitter) over its purported “hate speech.” Remember all the manufactured controversy about the movie Sound of Freedom, which the mainstream media definitely did not want you to see, and which dealt with the alarming reality of cartels sex-trafficking young children for the depraved enjoyment of American customers? Here’s something interesting: Disney obtained the rights to the *already finished* movie Sound of Freedom when they bought 21st Century Fox in 2019, and they promptly buried it, which is why it took until 2023 for the film to be independently released. Once again, interesting. Disney got into an expensive and very public pissing match with the State of Florida to defend the right of adults to groom school children into a lifestyle of anal sex and autogynephilia. Disney is boycotting a social media site that allows people to speak freely about things like whether the LGBT movement has ventured into the realm of pedophilia. Disney used its resources to delay the release of a movie that called attention to the problem of pedophilia and child sex trafficking in America. Disney does *not* boycott social media sites that have open and obvious problems with large pedophile networks. Once again, interesting. It’s almost as if Disney’s corporate culture is pedophile friendly, and the company is afraid of allowing people to speak out against pedophilia.
And speaking of pedophilia and sex trafficking, why do we still not have Jeffrey Epstein’s client list? We constantly see “secrets” getting leaked to the media, yet Epstein’s client list is guarded like Fort Knox or the Coca-Cola recipe. And once again, I notice so many of the folks who’ve used buzzwords like “speak truth to power” and hashtags like “#RESIST” don’t seem to be all that worried about the fact that our civilization’s most powerful men — a veritable who’s who of the WEF’s movers and shakers — hung out on a private island with a man who openly sex trafficked underage girls, and who seems to have done so as part of a joint CIA/Mossad honeypot operation to gain influence over these same men, and these stunning and brave culture warriors don’t seem all that bothered by the fact that our national governments and mainstream media have all colluded to cover it up.
Why would someone be so hysterical about the dangers of free speech, yet not at all concerned about pedophile networks and child sex trafficking? This seems to be a question worth asking.
[Note: in case the censorship Karens do eventually succeed in bringing Substack to heel, connect with me on X/Twitter at @DanielDHumor or on Telegram.]
Don’t you love the way today’s stunning and brave activists “fight the power” by agreeing with the Power and agitating for everything The Power wants? Their “revolutionary” ideals are proudly proclaimed by the marketing departments of all the biggest corporations and Wall Street banks. Conformmunism is clownworld at its most absurd.
I stumbled onto a chat somewhere recently here on Substack where a whole bunch of 'outraged' and 'sickened' folks were sharing and organizing a letter writing or messaging campaign to the Substack heads in order to demand something be done. They were all referencing the Katz article. They also had lists made of offending 'Nazi' Stacks. I had two thoughts. These people are hysterical, one, and two, even if those named Stacks had some truly awful content (probably not illegal, though), they sure weren't a problem for me, or anyone else here who cultivates their own community. It's not like any Nazis are reading and trying to disrupt my poetry writing. That's why I like it here. It's somewhat like the real world. I know there are crazies in it, but as long as they are ignored and kept to the margins, I can live in it. What these activist types want to do is actually the opposite, to draw everyone's attention to the crazies in order to destroy the platform for everyone else. It's not the crazies they are really after, it's just those they disagree with on any number of issues. They weaponize the worst, who have no actual purchase on the vast majority of normal people, to get at the moderates who do.
These marionettes think they are the smartest people in America, more evolutionary advanced than anyone who has ever lived. But all they really are is mediocre apologists for pederasts.